5.4. Atopy of the first degree relatives and depression of the proband

The CHAID technique was used to analyze the effects of maternal, paternal, and siblings’ atopies on a proband’s depression. As Figure 3 shows, in females the strongest risk factor in predicting self-reported lifetime depression was the presence of parental atopy (chi-square test, χ2 = 12.3, df = 1, p < 0.001) (IV: Figure 1). Another statistically significant predictor of depression was a proband’s regular daily smoking (χ2 = 11.9, df = 1, p < 0.001): When either mother or father were atopics, the proportion of cohort members with depression was 12.7%. Among non-smokers, whose parents and who themselves were atopics, the corresponding proportion was 9.0%. Interestingly, if there existed no parental history of atopy, then living in an urban area as well as a city dweller’s own atopy, were both statistically significant predictors of depression.

Figure 4 presents the results for hospital-treated depression in females (IV: Figure 2). Both sibling’s atopy as well as parental atopy were significant predictors for hospital-treated depression.

Figure 3. CHAID flowchart of the statistically significant predictors for self-reported lifetime depression involving female cohort members, the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort study (IV: Figure 1).

Figure 4. CHAID flowchart of the statistically significant predictors for hospital-treated depression involving female cohort members, the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort study (IV: Figure 2).

In the CHAID-analysis, none of the family atopy variables predicted depression among males. However, regular daily smoking among males was associated with both self-reported lifetime depression (χ2 = 4.1, df = 1, p = 0.044) and with hospital-treated depression (Fisher’s Exact test, p = 0.009).

In subsequent analyses, the effects of maternal and paternal atopies to a proband’s self-reported lifetime depression were investigated separately (Table 5; IV: Table 2). Logistic regression analyses showed that maternal atopy increased a female proband’s risk of lifetime depression up to 1.9-fold (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.0), while paternal atopy alone did not associate statistically significantly with a proband’s depression. The corresponding risk increased over 4-fold, when a female proband’s atopy was combined with parental (OR = 4.5, 95% CI 1.6–13.2) or maternal (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.8–9.4) atopy.

Table 5. Risk of depression associated with family atopy variables and with a cohort member’s own atopy for males and females in the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort (IV: Table 2).

The variables for own and familial atopyMales Females
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Single risk factor*
Parental atopy1.1 (0.2–4.6)2.1 (1.0–4.1)
Paternal atopy0.7 (0.3–1.7)1.6 (0.9–2.9)
Maternal atopy0.6 (0.3–1.5)1.9 (1.1–3.0)
Sibling’s atopy1.1 (0.6–2.0)1.4 (0.9–2.0)
Own atopy1.0 (0.4–2.0)1.6 (1.0–2.8)
Combined risk factors**
Own atopy and parental atopyaNot feasible4.5 (1.6–13.2)
Own atopy and paternal atopybNot feasible2.7 (0.9–7.8)
Own atopy and maternal atopyc1.2 (0.3–4.1)4.1 (1.8–9.4)
Own atopy and sibling atopyd1.0 (0.4–2.6)3.2 (1.7–6.1)
*Adjusted odds ratios (OR). In addition to family atopy variables, the following confounders were used in the logistic regression analyses: The dwelling place in 1966 (urban/rural), father’s social class in 1966 (classes I–II/classes III–IV/farmers), maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no), cohort member’s regular daily smoking at the age of 31 (regular smokers [i.e., smoking on 7 days per week]/occasional smokers [i.e. smoking less than on 7 days per week] and non-smokers), and mother’s parity in 1966 (grand multi-parity i.e. ≥6 deliveries/non-grand-multiparity i.e., 1–5 deliveries). **Reference category: neither own atopy nor parental atopya / paternal atopyb / maternal atopyc / sibling atopyd.