5.2. Procollagen propeptide markers and other disease activity markers in sarcoidosis and fibrosing alveolitis (I, II)

In the sarcoidosis group, there was no correlation between S-PIIINP and BALF-PIIINP or S-PICP and BALF-PICP, while BALF-PICP and BALF-PIIINP correlated significantly (see Fig. 1 in paper I). Neither BALF-PIIINP nor BALF-PICP correlated with FVC or the specific diffusion coefficient. BALF-PIIINP correlated well with S-ACE, S-IL-2R, BALF-albumin and BALF-lymphocytes (see Fig. 1 in paper I), while BALF-PICP correlated only with BALF-lymphocytes and BALF-albumin and not with S-ACE or S-IL-2R. In the control group, the serum and BALF values of the procollagen markers did not correlate with each other, nor was there any correlation between these markers and BALF-albumin or lymphocytes.

Twenty of the 60 sarcoidosis patients with parenchymal sarcoidosis had higher S-ACE and BALF-PIIINP than the remaining 40 patients with non-parenchymal disease. There was no significant difference in S-IL-2R, S-PIIINP, S- and BALF-PICP, BALF-albumin or BALF-lymphocytes between these groups (Table 7).

Table 7. Levels of S-IL-2R, S-ACE, S-PIIINP, S-PICP, BALF-albumin, BALF-lymphocytes, BALF-PIIINP and BALF-PICP in non-parenchymal and parenchymal sarcoidosis (I).

  Non-parenchymal sarcoidosisParenchymal sarcoidosis
Subjectsn4020 
S-ACEU/l139 ± 59.1        (n=38)190 ± 91.6 *(n=18)
S-IL2RU/l948 ± 613         (n=34)1537 ± 1930(n=16)
S-PIIINPµg/13.5 ± 1.03.6 ± 1.1 
S-PICPµg/1116 ± 37.3127 ± 51.1 
BALF-albuminmg/l111 ± 124.3120 ± 81.3 
BALF-lymphocytes%35.8 ± 18.542.1 ± 16.7 
BALF-PIIINP µg/1µg/14.4 ± 9.38.7 ± 10 ** 
ELF-PIIINPµg/1251 ± 533785 ± 1671 ** 
BALF-PICP µg/1µg/13.7 ± 8.2          (n=37)7.0 ± 10.5 
ELF-PICPµg/1220 ± 433290 ± 482 
The significance of the difference was tested with the Mann-Whitney U-test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

Forty-five of the 60 patients had prominent symptoms typical of sarcoidosis. BALF-PIIINP, BALF- PICP (see Table 4 in paper I), S-PIIINP and S-IL-2R (p=0.001, not shown) showed a tendency to increase in symptomatic disease. When the symptomatic patients were subdivided into ones with parenchymal and non-parenchymal disease, a tendency for the highest BALF-PIIINP and PICP values was observed in the groups of symptomatic patients with parenchymal disease (see Table 4 in paper I). Furthermore, S-PIIINP was significantly higher in symptomatic than non-symptomatic non-parenchymal sarcoidosis (symptomatic 3.77 ± 0.96µgL-1, non-symptomatic 2.89 ± 0.77µgL-1, p<0.01, not shown). Lung function data did not differ significantly between non-parenchymal and parenchymal disease, nor between symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients with and without parenchymal changes (see Table 5 in paper I). Significantly higher levels of ­PIIINP were seen in the BALF samples which contained the highest percentage of mast cells (see Table 6 in paper I).

In fibrosing alveolitis, BALF-PICP (r = -0.65, p < 0.01) and ELF-PICP (r = -0.59, p < 0.05), but not BALF- or ELF-PIIINP, had a significant negative correlation with DLCO/VA. The levels of PIIINP or PICP in BALF or ELF did not correlate with FVC. Nor did the levels of S-PIIINP and S-PICP correlate with those in BALF or ELF. The concentrations of PIIINP and PICP in BALF correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.60, p < 0.01).

During the follow-up period of six years, 7/18 patients died of fibrosing alveolitis, 3 of malignancy and 1 of an unknown cause. Detectable BALF-PIIINP had no prognostic significance if all the deaths were included, but predicted a poor prognosis in fibrosing ­alveolitis (Table 8, Table 9.). Diffusion capacity, when assessed either in absolute or percentage values, was lower in the patients who died of pulmonary fibrosis (4.24 ± 1.3 mmol/min/kPa, 64.0 ± 8.3 %) than in those who survived (5.81 ± 2.0 mmol/min/kPa, 85.7 ± 26.3 (p<0.05 Mann-Whitney U-test). The specific diffusion coefficient did not reveal any statistical differences between the two groups.

Table 8. Prognostic significance of BALF procollagen markers in fibrosing alveolitis (all causes of death) (II).

 All deaths (n=11)Alive (n=7)p *
BALF-PIIINPDetectable7 / 112 / 70.17
Non-detectabl4 / 115 / 7
BALF-PICPDetectable6 / 113 / 70.50
Non-detectable5 / 114 / 7
* Tested with Fisher´s exact probability test

Table 9. Prognostic significance of BALF procollagen markers in fibrosing alveolitis (patients who died of fibrosing alveolitis) (II).

  Died of fibrosing alveolitis (n=7) Alive (n=7) p*
BALF-PIIINPDetectable6 / 72 / 70.05
Non-detectable1 / 75 / 7
BALF-PICPDetectable4 / 73 / 70.50
Non-detectable3 / 74 / 7
* Tested with Fisher´s exact probability test