| Type I and III procollagen propeptides in sarcoidosis, fibrosing alveolitis and asbestos-related lung diseases | ||
|---|---|---|
| Prev | Chapter 5. Results | Next |
In the sarcoidosis group, there was no correlation between S-PIIINP and BALF-PIIINP or S-PICP and BALF-PICP, while BALF-PICP and BALF-PIIINP correlated significantly (see Fig. 1 in paper I). Neither BALF-PIIINP nor BALF-PICP correlated with FVC or the specific diffusion coefficient. BALF-PIIINP correlated well with S-ACE, S-IL-2R, BALF-albumin and BALF-lymphocytes (see Fig. 1 in paper I), while BALF-PICP correlated only with BALF-lymphocytes and BALF-albumin and not with S-ACE or S-IL-2R. In the control group, the serum and BALF values of the procollagen markers did not correlate with each other, nor was there any correlation between these markers and BALF-albumin or lymphocytes.
Twenty of the 60 sarcoidosis patients with parenchymal sarcoidosis had higher S-ACE and BALF-PIIINP than the remaining 40 patients with non-parenchymal disease. There was no significant difference in S-IL-2R, S-PIIINP, S- and BALF-PICP, BALF-albumin or BALF-lymphocytes between these groups (Table 7).
Table 7. Levels of S-IL-2R, S-ACE, S-PIIINP, S-PICP, BALF-albumin, BALF-lymphocytes, BALF-PIIINP and BALF-PICP in non-parenchymal and parenchymal sarcoidosis (I).
| Non-parenchymal sarcoidosis | Parenchymal sarcoidosis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | n | 40 | 20 | |
| S-ACE | U/l | 139 ± 59.1 (n=38) | 190 ± 91.6 * | (n=18) |
| S-IL2R | U/l | 948 ± 613 (n=34) | 1537 ± 1930 | (n=16) |
| S-PIIINP | µg/1 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | |
| S-PICP | µg/1 | 116 ± 37.3 | 127 ± 51.1 | |
| BALF-albumin | mg/l | 111 ± 124.3 | 120 ± 81.3 | |
| BALF-lymphocytes | % | 35.8 ± 18.5 | 42.1 ± 16.7 | |
| BALF-PIIINP µg/1 | µg/1 | 4.4 ± 9.3 | 8.7 ± 10 ** | |
| ELF-PIIINP | µg/1 | 251 ± 533 | 785 ± 1671 ** | |
| BALF-PICP µg/1 | µg/1 | 3.7 ± 8.2 (n=37) | 7.0 ± 10.5 | |
| ELF-PICP | µg/1 | 220 ± 433 | 290 ± 482 | |
| The significance of the difference was tested with the Mann-Whitney U-test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 | ||||
Forty-five of the 60 patients had prominent symptoms typical of sarcoidosis. BALF-PIIINP, BALF- PICP (see Table 4 in paper I), S-PIIINP and S-IL-2R (p=0.001, not shown) showed a tendency to increase in symptomatic disease. When the symptomatic patients were subdivided into ones with parenchymal and non-parenchymal disease, a tendency for the highest BALF-PIIINP and PICP values was observed in the groups of symptomatic patients with parenchymal disease (see Table 4 in paper I). Furthermore, S-PIIINP was significantly higher in symptomatic than non-symptomatic non-parenchymal sarcoidosis (symptomatic 3.77 ± 0.96µgL-1, non-symptomatic 2.89 ± 0.77µgL-1, p<0.01, not shown). Lung function data did not differ significantly between non-parenchymal and parenchymal disease, nor between symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients with and without parenchymal changes (see Table 5 in paper I). Significantly higher levels of PIIINP were seen in the BALF samples which contained the highest percentage of mast cells (see Table 6 in paper I).
In fibrosing alveolitis, BALF-PICP (r = -0.65, p < 0.01) and ELF-PICP (r = -0.59, p < 0.05), but not BALF- or ELF-PIIINP, had a significant negative correlation with DLCO/VA. The levels of PIIINP or PICP in BALF or ELF did not correlate with FVC. Nor did the levels of S-PIIINP and S-PICP correlate with those in BALF or ELF. The concentrations of PIIINP and PICP in BALF correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.60, p < 0.01).
During the follow-up period of six years, 7/18 patients died of fibrosing alveolitis, 3 of malignancy and 1 of an unknown cause. Detectable BALF-PIIINP had no prognostic significance if all the deaths were included, but predicted a poor prognosis in fibrosing alveolitis (Table 8, Table 9.). Diffusion capacity, when assessed either in absolute or percentage values, was lower in the patients who died of pulmonary fibrosis (4.24 ± 1.3 mmol/min/kPa, 64.0 ± 8.3 %) than in those who survived (5.81 ± 2.0 mmol/min/kPa, 85.7 ± 26.3 (p<0.05 Mann-Whitney U-test). The specific diffusion coefficient did not reveal any statistical differences between the two groups.
Table 8. Prognostic significance of BALF procollagen markers in fibrosing alveolitis (all causes of death) (II).
| All deaths (n=11) | Alive (n=7) | p * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALF-PIIINP | Detectable | 7 / 11 | 2 / 7 | 0.17 |
| Non-detectabl | 4 / 11 | 5 / 7 | ||
| BALF-PICP | Detectable | 6 / 11 | 3 / 7 | 0.50 |
| Non-detectable | 5 / 11 | 4 / 7 | ||
| * Tested with Fisher´s exact probability test | ||||
Table 9. Prognostic significance of BALF procollagen markers in fibrosing alveolitis (patients who died of fibrosing alveolitis) (II).
| Died of fibrosing alveolitis (n=7) | Alive (n=7) | p* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALF-PIIINP | Detectable | 6 / 7 | 2 / 7 | 0.05 |
| Non-detectable | 1 / 7 | 5 / 7 | ||
| BALF-PICP | Detectable | 4 / 7 | 3 / 7 | 0.50 |
| Non-detectable | 3 / 7 | 4 / 7 | ||
| * Tested with Fisher´s exact probability test | ||||